- Five of the Most Dangerous Foods for Young Children
- 10-Year-Old Crossing Items Off 'Vision Bucket List' Before Disease Robs Him of Sight
- Groundbreaking Procedure Saves MD Man After Devastating Stroke
- Sinai Hospital Researchers Working to Prevent Heart Attacks
- Doctors at Hopkins Develop Procedure to Cure Excessive Sweating
- Health Officials Warning Americans of Mosquito-Borne Illness
- Study: Red Meat Possibly Linked to Breast Cancer
- Report: Diabetes Numbers Continue To Rise In US
- AMA Policy Backs Strict E-Cigarette Restrictions
- Healthy Seniors Tested in Bid to Block Alzheimer's
- Study: Antidepressant May Cut Alzheimer's Protein
- The Deer Antler Velvet Supplement Debate
- Johns Hopkins Cancer Center Using $65M Gift for New Patient Care Building
- Gansler Calls For Manufacturers To Prevent Kids From 'Vaping'
- Recent Study May Provide Key To 'Fountain Of Youth'
- Study: Coffee May Decrease Risk for Type 2 Diabetes
- Study: Laughter May Help Improve Short-Term Memory
- Effective Weight Loss Pill on the Horizon? Study Sees Promising Results
- New Treatment Helps Paralyzed Patients Move Again
- Survey: Rate of Uninsured Americans Drops
- National Volunteer Month and the Healing Power Of Dogs
- Encouraging Results from New Drug in Stalling Cancer Growth
- New Non-Invasive Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation Safer, More Effective
- Study: Odd Sleep Schedules May Lead to Irreversible Brain Cell Damage
- States Vote on Restricting Teen Tanning
- Study: Using Acupuncture to Treat Chemo Side Effects for Breast Cancer Patients
- Study to Test 'Chocolate' Pills for Heart Health
- Is the Egg An Essential Part of a Healthy Diet?
- Researchers: Blood Test Could Predict Alzheimer's in Elderly Patients
- Doctors Hope for Cure in a Second Baby Born With HIV
- 2-Year Extension Seen For Canceled Health Plans
- Diabetes and Risk of Stroke, an Inside Look at the Dangers and Warning Signs
- What is Best: Wild or Farm-Raised Salmon?
- How to Eat Healthy on a Budget
- Indiana Woman Gives Birth to Healthy Boy, Didn't Know She Was Pregnant
- California Senator Seeks Review of Paralysis Cases
- Study Suggests Women Reduce Risk of Cancer By Removing Ovaries by 35
- Polio-Like Illness a Mystery in California
- Maryland Health Benefit Exchange Fires IT Contractor
- MD Official: Listeria Patients Have Recovered
- Maryland Maternity Access Coalition Seeks Statewide Injured Baby Fund
- MD Resets Goal for Health Insurance Enrollment
- Take Action Thursday: Heart Disease
- Asthma in Winter: Tips for Minimizing Attacks
- Healthy Drinks for Kids
- Heart Disease: The Symptoms Many Might Not Recognize
- Health Exchange Woes to Come Before Md. Board
- Workers, Business Owners Debate Sick-Leave Mandate
- Study: Occasional 'Treat' May Help Overall Weight Loss
- 'Broken Heart Syndrome,' Can Have Symptoms Similar to Heart Attack, Study Finds
FDA Reconsiders Heart Safety of Common Pain Pills
Updated: Monday, February 10 2014, 05:04 PM EST
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal health experts are taking a second look this week at the heart safety of pain medications used by millions of Americans to treat arthritis and other everyday aches and pains.
The Food and Drug Administration on Monday began a two-day meeting to examine the latest research on anti-inflammatory medicines called NSAIDS, which serve as the backbone of U.S. pain treatment.
The key question is whether naproxen - the key ingredient in Bayer's Aleve and many other generic pain pills - carries a lower risk of heart attack and stroke than rival medications like ibuprofen, sold as Advil by Pfizer and Motrin by Johnson & Johnson, among others.
Debate about whether one drug is safer than others in the class has waged for more than a decade without a clear answer, underscoring the lingering questions that hang over even the most established medicines.
The FDA is asking its panel of medical experts to review a massive analysis published last year suggesting that naproxen does not increase the risk of heart problems as much as its peers. The finding came from Oxford University researchers who reviewed results from more than 700 NSAID studies involving roughly 350,000 patients.
On Tuesday panelists will vote on whether naproxen has a lower risk of heart problems than other NSAIDs. Panelists will also discuss whether naproxen should be relabeled based on the latest safety data. The FDA is not required to follow the group's advice, though it often does.
If implemented, the labeling change could reshape the multibillion-dollar market for drugs used to treat muscle pain, arthritis and headaches. Last year U.S. consumers bought more than 275 million boxes of over-the-counter ibuprofen and naproxen, representing $1.7 billion in sales, according to retail tracker IRI. Prescription NSAIDs brought in billions more, led by the Pfizer's blockbuster Celebrex, with sales of $2.9 billion.
But before any changes can be made, FDA advisers will have to wrestle with reams of data that are often riddled with complicating factors:
- The Oxford analysis is difficult to interpret because it combines information from hundreds of unrelated studies. While this approach is useful in getting a broad view of rare events - such as heart attacks - it is not considered the strongest form of medical evidence.
- Almost all of the data under discussion come from studies of prescription NSAID pain relievers, which are taken at higher doses and for longer periods than over-the-counter NSAIDs. But panelists will be asked to make recommendations on the use of non-prescription drugs as well.
Monday's meeting mainly consisted of presentations dissecting the latest findings from academics, FDA scientists and drug company staffers.
The pharmaceutical companies generally staked out positions that would most benefit their respective products.
Bayer, which markets Aleve, said the drug's labeling should reflect the new research suggesting it is a safer option.
Pfizer, maker of Advil and Celebrex, argued that there is no conclusive data that naproxen is safer than other products. The New York company said current labeling should remain in place until more conclusive evidence is available.
Pfizer is wrapping up work on a large multiyear study called PRECISION designed to definitely answer whether there is a difference in cardiovascular safety between naproxen, ibuprofen and Celebrex.
But the FDA is considering halting work on that study given that evidence already suggests lower rates of heart attack and stroke for naproxen. FDA's panel will weigh in on the fate of the study Tuesday.
This week's meeting is the latest chapter in an ongoing safety review of NSAIDS that stretches back to 2004, when Merck & Co Inc. pulled its blockbuster pain reliever Vioxx off the market due to links to heart attack and stroke.
Vioxx had been heavily advertised as a new kind of NSAID that was supposed to be easier on the stomach. But its withdrawal shook the medical establishment and ushered in a new era of drug safety at the FDA.
In 2005, the agency added boxed warnings about the risk of heart attack and stroke to all prescription NSAIDS, including Celebrex and high-dose versions of ibuprofen and naproxen. Celebrex is the only drug from the same class as Vioxx that remains on the market.
The agency also beefed up labeling on lower-dose, over-the-counter NSAIDs like Aleve, Motrin and Advil. Those drugs currently warn patients to take the lowest dose possible for only a few days at a time to avoid the same risks as prescription NSAIDs.
But that advice is also getting a second look this week. A recent analysis by Danish researchers suggests heart problems can emerge with all NSAIDS after less than a week of treatment.
The FDA panel will vote Tuesday on whether over-the-counter NSAID labeling should be changed to warn patients of the short-term risks.
Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.