- Dueling Bills Over Speed Camera Fallout Reveal Divided Council
- Mayor: Media 'Beating a Dead Horse' on Speed Camera Ticket Errors
- Baltimore City Councilman: Subpoena Vote a 'Whitewash'
- Date Set For Speed Camera Subpoena: Council Will Not Rule Out Calling Mayor To Testify
- As Speed Camera Investigation Vote Looms, Council Remains Silent
- Baltimore City Inks Second Secrecy Clause with Speed Camera Vendor
- State Releases Maryland Heath Exchange Salaries, Totaling Millions
- Hidden Deficit Threatens Baltimore City Finances
- Baltimore City To Drop Speed Camera Bounty System
- Baltimore Mayor Calls Police Action a 'Delicate Balancing Act'
- Lawyer Blasts Report On In-Custody Death of Anthony Anderson
- Delegate Calls For Ethics Probe Of Baltimore County School Chief
- Panel's Sanction Of Police Tactic Under Scrutiny
- Police Say Rumors of 'Knock Out Game' Assault in Inner Harbor Are False
- Mayor: Departing Corrections Chief Maynard Should Be 'Proud' Of His Work
- Baltimore City Ranks Fourteenth Highest in Nation For Tax Lien Sales
- City Police Memo Details Off-Duty Gun Ban At Ravens Stadium
- Price Tag To Transition To New Medevac Helicopters Continues To Grow
- Council Seeks to Eliminate Criminal Records from Job Applications in Baltimore City
- Multi-County Symposium on Speed Camera Policies, Best Practices Closed to the Public
Baltimore City Councilman: Subpoena Vote a 'Whitewash'
Updated: Tuesday, January 28 2014, 05:37 PM EST
A councilman who wanted subpoena powers to investigate the city's speed camera system today blasted a vote that steered the probe from his committee.
"Obviously this is a whitewash," councilman Carl Stokes told FOX45
On Monday Stokes failed to muster enough votes to gain what's known as "immediate adoption" of resolution that would have granted his committee, Taxation and Finance, subpoena powers. The councilman introduced the resolution after a secret audit revealed the city's speed camera system had a higher rate of errors than city officials previously admitted.
But the resolution was sent to the Judiciary and Investigations committee where it will be considered in a hearing chaired by Councilman James Kraft.
It's a move Stokes claims was meant to keep him in check and stall the investigation.
"It was the group of guys who decided to protect the mayor," Stokes said.
Councilman Kraft was a no-show at an afternoon council hearing and his office said he was unavailable for comment.
CLICK HERE for the audit.